THE USE OF JUMBLED SENTENCE GAME TO IMPROVE STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING ON ADJECTIVE ORDER IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah Plus Salatiga in the Academic Year 2018/2019).

Novitasari, Elsa Putri (2019) THE USE OF JUMBLED SENTENCE GAME TO IMPROVE STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING ON ADJECTIVE ORDER IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah Plus Salatiga in the Academic Year 2018/2019). Other thesis, IAIN SALATIGA.

Text ELSA PUTRI NOVITASARI 113-14-129..pdf Download (3MB)

Abstract

This research was aimed to improve the students understanding on adjective order in writing descriptive text using jumbled sentence game. Thus research answered two questions (1) How is the implementation of jumbled sentence game to improve students understanding on adjective order in writing descriptive text at SMA Muhammadiyah Plus Salatiga? (2) How far is the improvement of the students understanding on adjective order in writing descriptive text when jumbled sentence game is implemented at SMA Muhammadiyah Plus Salatiga? The research design of this research was Classroom Action Research. It was conducted in two cycles. Each cycle consisted of planning, action, observation, and reflection. From the study, the researcher could conclude that the implementation of the study improved from cycle 1 and cycle 2. From the research, the researcher could conclude that the implementation of the study improved from cycle 1 and cycle 2. The KKM (KriteriaKetuntasan Minimal) or passing grade was 70. The target of this research was 80% students who passed passing grade. The result shown that the students who reached standardized score in cycle 1 were only 26.32% and 73.68% got score lower than the KKM. The mean score of pre-test was 61.79 and post test was 72.68. On the result of cycle 2, there were 100% of students who reached standardized score. The mean of pre-test and post-test in cycle 2 were 77.95 and 94. Moreover, the t-table was 2.10 and the T-test of cycle 1 was 10.29 and the T-test of cycle 2 was 11.04. The value of t-test was bigger than the value of the t-table, so the alternative hypothesis was accepted and the null hypothesis was rejected. These results could be seen from the pre-test and post-test of cycle 1 and 2.

Actions (login required)

View Item